The seminar activities are based on the requirements for the review so tutorial attendance is imperative Structure of Review: Title Page (Title, module – not included in word count) Introduction (Brief – including source of topic/headline) Review of relevant literature for topic (both tertiary and academic required – relevant business models/frameworks) Summary – should provide research question/objectives. References (not included in word count) Appendix (not included in word count – should include methodology review sheet and Gantt Chart) An example review (assessment) will be posted here after the lectures in week 5. The example completes the contents of the week 5 workshop. Please note: The appendix is there only for guidance and we will be having classes on research methods. Please note the review requires a minimum of 3 academic references + secondary source references. In seminar 3 we will be discussing your methodology for your headline/business research. The example of the Appendix is based on my Monarch Review Please note appendix 1 has headings but you can write it without the headings. You must include on example/reference to a secondary data source. Aim to reference (academically) methodology related subjects – like mixed methods or qualitative, quantitative. These all have sources in the Saunders et al (2016) textbook. Do not forget if planning to use primary data tool – questionnaire or interview or focus group do make it clear the sample or the criteria for interviewees or focus group members. Please remember they are anonymous. This simply shows you how marks are allocated. Reviews will be marked online and graded online. Helpful summary guide for references. This is not a complete guide. For all details please view DMU Harvard Referencing Guide. Must be included in appendix of the proposal.