Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/bestwdxf/public_html/wp-content/themes/bethemeMain/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1506

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/bestwdxf/public_html/wp-content/themes/bethemeMain/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1511

How NASA’s failure to respond to change, such as internal operating procedures, lead to the Columbia disaster


Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/bestwdxf/public_html/wp-content/themes/bethemeMain/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1506

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/bestwdxf/public_html/wp-content/themes/bethemeMain/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1511

Need substantial discussion posts to 2 discussions, in APA format, with sources

DISCUSSION 1

On Feb. 1, 2003, the space shuttle Columbia flew over a calm Texas sky in the early morning hours in preparation for its landing at the Kennedy Space in Florida. Tragically, the space shuttle split apart on reentry, costing the lives of all seven astronauts aboard. A 2-year study by the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) revealed that NASA had failed to address organizational cultural issues that inevitably led them to ignore warning signs from safety engineers. Put simply, NASA employees exhibited resistance to change and leadership and had not implemented effective strategies for overcoming it.

Resistance and resilience are important concepts in change management. Resilience allows a system to retain its structure and function in the face of external and internal changes and challenges. For the astronauts aboard the shuttle Columbia, the failure of NASA to be resilient and overcome resistance to change had fatal consequences. In most public and nonprofit organizations, although the consequences might not be as dire, leaders must be effective in implementing organizational change and overcoming resistance or risk harming the public good they serve as their mission.

For this Discussion, read this week’s Learning Resources, including Howell (2013) on the Columbia disaster. If necessary, research other online articles related to the Columbia disaster in order to answer the Discussion.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post by Day 3 an explanation of how NASA’s failure to respond to change, such as internal operating procedures, lead to the Columbia disaster. In your explanation, describe how resistance to change affected the outcome. Then, using the example of your own or another organization with which you are familiar, explain one strategy for overcoming resistance to change and building in resilience, and explain why you chose this strategy.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources and other current literature

DISCUSSION 2

Discussion 2: Leading Organizational Change

Reflecting on a government or nonprofit organization with which you are most familiar, describe one type

of change that has or may occur that might affect this public or nonprofit organization, and explain why.

Finally, describe at least two challenges that might arise during the implementation of change and how a leader might address these.

Post your answer by Day 4.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources and

other current literature

Readings

  • Entwhistle, T. (2011). For appropriateness or consequences? Explaining organizational change in English local government. Public Administration, 89(2), 661–680.
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
  • Lewis, A. (2012). Finding a model for managing change. Training & Development, 39(5), 6–7.
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
  • Packard, T., Patti, R., Daly, D., & Tucker-Tatlow, J. (2012). Organizational change for services integration in public human service organizations: Experiences in seven counties. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 34(4), 471–525.
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
  • Tummers, L., Steijn, B., & Bekkers, V. (2012). Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement public policies, content, context, and personality characteristics. Public Administration, 90(3), 716–736.
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
  • Howell, E. (2013). Columbia disaster: What happened, what NASA learned. Retrieved from http://www.space.com/19436-columbia-disaster.html

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /home/bestwdxf/public_html/wp-content/themes/bethemeMain/includes/content-single.php on line 281
Best Essay Solutions